6 days ago
25
Andy Burnham has announced his intention to stand in the Gorton and Denton byelection in east Manchester, after months of speculation that he hopes to challenge prime minister Keir Starmer for the Labour leadership.
Burnham, the mayor of Greater Manchester, had until 5pm on Saturday to declare his intention to run. He waited until the last moment to announce his plans to seek the candidacy as speculation over his decision reached fever pitch.
In a statement, Burnham said that, if elected, he would “support the work of government not undermine it”. He added that he had “passed this assurance” to the prime minister.
Burnham’s application could still be blocked by Labour’s national executive committee. The party’s ruling body is dominated by Starmer allies who may try to prevent Burnham’s return to parliament, although a growing number of MPs have expressed opposition to this.
The byelection was called this week after the resignation of the former minister Andrew Gwynne, who announced he was standing down because of ill health. Gwynne sat as an independent after being suspended from Labour over offensive WhatsApp messages.
It has long been rumoured that Burnham, 56, would mount a bid to replace Gwynne, 51. Days before the party’s conference in Liverpool last year, Burnham told the Telegraph that Labour MPs had contacted him over the summer to stand after becoming concerned at Starmer’s growing unpopularity.
Polling suggests Starmer is one of the least popular Labour prime ministers ever and Labour MPs are increasingly concerned about how his leadership will impact May’s local elections.
Burnham said in a letter to the NEC, which he shared on social media at 5pm on Saturday, that deciding to put his name forward had been a “difficult decision” but he felt that standing was “in the best interests” of both the party and Greater Manchester.
He said: “I have come to the conclusion that this is the moment to mount the strongest possible defence of what we stand for and what we have built in this city over many generations.”
He said he wanted to run a “hopeful and unifying” campaign. If selected, he would face strong challenges from Reform UK and the Green party.
In his letter, Burnham said Greater Manchester faced a “direct threat” to “everything [it] has always been about from a brand of politics which seeks to pit people against each other”, perceived as a reference to the growth of the populist right. Some polling has suggested Burnham is the only Labour candidate who could see off a challenge from Nigel Farage’s party.
Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, and Labour’s deputy leader, Lucy Powell, both told the Fabian Society’s conference on Saturday that Burnham should be allowed to stand.
Khan told the event in central London: “I’m a firm believer in the best team having all the talent playing for them, and if Andy wants to return to parliament, I will try and make some time between now and the byelection to knock on some doors for him.”
Meanwhile Powell, who represents the neighbouring Manchester Central constituency, said the NEC should be wary of blocking Burnham from standing.
She said it should be up to Burnham and party members in the constituency whether he is allowed to be the Labour candidate. She praised Burnham as “incredibly popular” and as having changed Manchester “for the better”.
She said: “It should be up to Andy and the local members who will select their candidate, and our members are very discerning.”
Powell also acknowledged Labour could easily lose to either Reform or the Green party if the wrong candidate was selected.
“In that context, I always want to see the very best candidate, the person who can most help Labour win in that very difficult byelection,” she said. “I want to see the best candidates come forward and be able to come forward and help us win.”
Health secretary Wes Streeting, perceived as Burnham’s biggest rival for the leadership should Starmer be deposed, refused to say whether he would support Burnham’s candidacy.
“This is a decision for the party, not for the cabinet,” he said. “I have been told in no uncertain terms that is my answer to the question. This is a really critical byelection. We have to work hard to earn people’s trust and to earn every vote. We want the best possible candidate for that byelection.”
However, he added: “In the last day or so, without having indicated whether he wants to run, I’ve seen some pretty unkind things said about Andy, as usual from people who don’t put their names on this sort of briefing. I think that is a disgraceful way to treat someone who is a Labour mayor, part of our team and part of our movement.”
On Saturday afternoon, Miatta Fahnbulleh, parliamentary under secretary of state in the housing, communities and local government became one of the first MPs on the government payroll to suggest Burnham should be allowed to stand.
She said: “We’ve got the fight of our lives on our hands to beat Reform, which we have a moral duty to the country to do, and we need our best team on the pitch. So if he wants to put his hat in the ring and if he can persuade his members and persuade the electorate to bring him in then I think he would be an asset.”
“I know No10 is inept but surely they are not inept enough to allow a man to enter parliament for the sole purpose of challenging the prime minister.”
“Are there any examples in modern politics of someone from the same party seeking office in a by-election with the widely known intention to tear down the government when the time is right?”
“If he stands, it will be to go on the backbenches until the prime minister decides to give him a role,” one Starmer ally said. “These are the facts he needs to consider.
“There is no vacancy for leader if that is where his ambition lies. Very few in the PLP would welcome the distraction of any talk of a leadership challenge.”
Another backbench MP added: “We are gearing up for crucial elections across the country. We really don’t need a Burnham circus taking resources away – he needs to put the party before personal ambition for a change.
“Besides, a mayoral byelection would cost around £5m. It simply wouldn’t be right to cut short his term in this way.”
